| |
PRE-ENGINEERED STEEL BUILDING (PEB's) |
CONVENTIONAL STEEL BUILDINGS |
|
| • |
Pre-engineered
buildings are on an avg.30%
lighter through the efficient
use of steel. Primary framing
members are tapered (varying
depth). Built-up plate sections
have greater depth in areas
of higher stress. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| • |
Secondary
members are light gauge (light
weight) roll formed (low labour
cost) ‘Z’ or ‘C’
shaped members. |
|
| • |
Primary steel members are selected
from standard hot rolls ‘I’
selection, which are in many
segments of the members heavier
than what is actually required
by design. Members have constant
cross-section regardless of
varying magnitude of the local
stresses along the member length.
|
| |
|
| • |
Secondary member are selected
from standard hot rolled ‘I’
& ‘c’ Section,
which are heavier. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| • |
Quick and efficient, Since PEB’s are mainly formed of standard section and connection, design time is significantly reduced. Basic designs are used over and over.
|
| |
|
| • |
Specialized
computer analysis and design
programs optimize material required.
Drafting is also computerized
using standard details that
minimize project custom details. |
| |
|
| • |
PEB engineers design & detail
Pre-Engineered Building almost
every day through out the year
resulting in faster & more
efficient designs. |
| |
|
| • |
In-house
consultants for designing and
drafting reduces time considerably,
allowing more time for co-ordering
and review and also increases
margin fees. |
|
| • |
Each conventional steel structure
is designed from scratch by
the consultant, with fewer design
aids available to the engineer.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| • |
Substantial engineering &
detailing is required on every
project. Generalized computer
analysis programs require extensive
input/output & design alterations.
|
| |
|
| • |
Each
project is a separate case.
Engineers need more time to
develop the design & details
of the unique structure. |
| |
|
| • |
More complicated design requiring
extensive design and drafting
time from consultants. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| • |
Average 20 to 26 weeks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| • |
Simple design, easy to construct and light weight.
|
|
| • |
Extensive heavy foundation required.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| • |
Both
cost & time of erection
are accurately known, based
upon extensive experience with
similar buildings.
PEB’s are often erected
by specialized PEB builders
with extensive experience in
the erection of similar buildings.
They usually have a stock of
standard components in their
camps, enabling them to complete
jobs on time even if there is
any shortage or site damage
to materials.
|
| |
|
| • |
The erection process is easy , fast, step and with hardly any requirement of any equipment. |
|
| • |
Typical, they are 20% more Expensive
than PEB. In most of the cases
the erection cost and time are
not estimated accurately. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| • |
Erection is slow and extensive design and drafting is required time from consultants.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| • |
The low-weight flexible frames offer higher resistances to seismic Forces.
|
|
| • |
Rigid heavy structure do not perform well in seismic zone. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| • |
Price per square meter may be as much as 30% lower than conventional steels. |
|
| • |
High price per square meter. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| • |
Outstanding
architectural design can be
achieved at low cost using standard
architectural feature and interface
details. Traditional wall and
fascia material, such as concrete,
masonry and wood can be utilized.
|
|
| • |
Special architectural design and feature must be developed for each project which often requires research and thus resulting in much higher costs.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| • |
Building is supplied complete with cladding and all accessories, including erection(if desired) from one single source.
|
|
| • |
Many sources of supply: project management time is required to coordinate supplier and sub-contractors. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| • |
Single source of supply results
in total responsibility by one
supplier including design liability.
PEB manufacturers can be relied
upon to service their buildings
long after they have supplied,
to protect their reputation.
|
|
| • |
Multiple sources of supply can
result in confusion over the
identity of person responsible
when components do not fit properly,
insufficient material is supplied,
or material fails to perform
at the supplier contractor interface.
The consultant carries total
design liability. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| • |
All components have been designed
specifically to act together
as a system, for maximum efficiency,
precise fit and peak performance
on the field. |
| |
|
| • |
Experience with similar buildings
in actual field conditions have
resulted in improvements in
design over time that allow
dependable prediction of performance.
|
|
| • |
Components
are custom designed for a specific
application on a specific job,
design and errors possible when
assembling the diverse components
into unique building.
|
| |
|
| • |
Each building design is unique
so prediction of how components
will perform together is uncertain.
Materials, which have performed
well in some climates may not
do so in other environments.
|
|